{ "description": "Browse aymeric's, an independent, searchable archive of readable snapshots from followed feeds, preserved in Git with aggr.", "feed_url": "https://aggr.aymericbeaumet.com/sources/ricursive.com/feed.json", "home_page_url": "https://aggr.aymericbeaumet.com/sources/ricursive.com/", "items": [ { "authors": [ { "name": "Philpax" } ], "content_html": "

Rather than investing in a brute-force RL climb, we carefully iterated on our SFT and RL recipes with a focus on compute efficiency. We opted not to buy any posttraining data, instead devising our own synthetic data pipelines, quality filtering, and coverage metrics.

\n

Our mixed RL recipe uses truncated importance sampling, score centering, and linear length penalty with high-quality long-horizon synthetic environments. The RL tasks are tuned for our model capabilities, and we continuously added harder tasks as the model improved.

\n

The end result was a steep RL climb from a strong initial SFT checkpoint. We reached a TerminalBench 2.1 score of 80.5 with only 1.4M rollouts, roughly 70x fewer rollouts than Reflection Beam, the prior SOTA.

\n", "date_modified": "2026-11-04T18:53:29+00:00", "date_published": "2026-11-04T18:53:29+00:00", "external_url": "https://www.ricursive.com/ripple", "id": "urn:aggr:item:391569679cd3557c37c2d8e83e53f0dcc15dda4d", "image": "https://framerusercontent.com/images/u4OXzV0utwAtaPgcVxQtTXmkg.png", "summary": "Rather than investing in a brute-force RL climb, we carefully iterated on our SFT and RL recipes with a focus on compute efficiency. We opted not to buy any posttraining data, instead devising our own synthetic data pipelines, quality…", "tags": [ "news" ], "title": "Ripple-65B Preview: U.S. Open-Weight SOTA on Agentic Coding", "url": "https://aggr.aymericbeaumet.com/items/hnrss-org/2026-11-04-ripple-65b-preview-u-s-open-weight-sota-on-agentic-coding/" } ], "language": "en", "title": "ricursive.com", "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1.1" }